IVV vs WTV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree US Value Fund
Which is better, IVV or WTV?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, WTV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. WTV is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.12% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $3.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.86% |
| Holdings | 508 | 124 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +14.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71% | +20.86%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | +13.91%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4%Best | 19.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -42.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262 | $19,178Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 20.0%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 23, 2007 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2017 to Sep 10, 2026 (8.7 years).
IVV vs WTV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs WTV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree US Value Fund (WTV) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while WTV returned +20.00%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 14.74% for WTV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +20.86% for WTV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +13.91% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.60% annualized vs +12.83%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WTV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 16.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -42.2% for WTV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WTV charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $12 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.86% for WTV.
Holdings Overlap
26.5% of IVV's money is in holdings WTV also owns. 80.0% of WTV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of WTV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
93 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 125 in WTV, against full books of 508 and 124.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for WTV that do not appear in our book for IVV (19.2% of the fund), and 402 for IVV that do not appear in WTV (72.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in WTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 3.40% | 4.58% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 1.43% | 2.65% | 1.22% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 1.21% | 0.73% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.72% | 2.04% | 1.32% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc. | 0.24% | 1.92% | 1.68% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 0.54% | 0.97% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.35% | 1.68% | 1.33% |
| TGTTarget Corp. | 0.10% | 1.84% | 1.74% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.94% | 0.90% | 0.04% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.48% | 1.35% | 0.87% |
80.0% of WTV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WTV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTV charges 0.12%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or WTV?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +20.00% for WTV, so WTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +13.60% vs +12.83% for WTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or WTV?
WTV has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 16.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs WTV -42.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and WTV?
IVV and WTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WTV?
80.0% of WTV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 80.0% of WTV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 93 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 125 in WTV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WTV?
IVV yields 1.06% while WTV yields 1.86%, so WTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WTV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, WTV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. WTV is less concentrated, with 20.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.