IVV vs XCOR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs FundX ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XCOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.15% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $179M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.38% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 12 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +10.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +18.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +21.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -22.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | FundX Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 14, 2022 |
IVV vs XCOR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and FundX ETF (XCOR) is a ETF from FundX Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while XCOR returned +18.76%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 10.91% for XCOR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +21.30% for XCOR. Across the full 4-year window we track, XCOR has the edge at +19.65% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for XCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -22.5% for XCOR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XCOR charges 1.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $115 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.38% for XCOR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XCOR share 0 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XCOR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XCOR charges 1.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XCOR?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +18.76% for XCOR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +19.65% for XCOR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XCOR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for XCOR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XCOR -22.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and XCOR?
IVV and XCOR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XCOR?
IVV and XCOR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XCOR?
IVV yields 1.09% while XCOR yields 0.38%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.