IVV vs XIDV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. XIDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XIDV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $47M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 5.77% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 90 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +20.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +28.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 9.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -12.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 21, 2025 |
IVV vs XIDV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while XIDV returned +28.80%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 20.50% for XIDV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 9.8% for XIDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -12.2% for XIDV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.13. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XIDV charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $19 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 5.77% for XIDV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XIDV share 0 holdings out of 592 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XIDV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XIDV charges 0.19%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XIDV?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +28.80% for XIDV, so XIDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +40.55% for XIDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XIDV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 9.8% for XIDV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XIDV -12.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and XIDV?
IVV and XIDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.13, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XIDV?
IVV and XIDV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 592 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XIDV?
IVV yields 1.10% while XIDV yields 5.77%, so XIDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.