IVV vs XOMO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. XOMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XOMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.25% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $39M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 37.71% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 13 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +23.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +36.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +9.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 30, 2023 |
IVV vs XOMO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while XOMO returned +36.21%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 23.78% for XOMO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +9.26% for XOMO. Across the full 3-year window we track, XOMO has the edge at +9.26% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.9% for XOMO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.16. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XOMO charges 1.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $125 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 37.71% for XOMO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XOMO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XOMO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XOMO charges 1.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XOMO?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +36.21% for XOMO, so XOMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +9.26% for XOMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XOMO?
XOMO has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XOMO -18.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and XOMO?
IVV and XOMO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.16, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XOMO?
IVV and XOMO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XOMO?
IVV yields 1.10% while XOMO yields 37.71%, so XOMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.