VXUS vs XOMO
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF vs YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. XOMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VXUS | XOMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 1.25% | |
| AUM | $156.5B | $40M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 39.96% | |
| Holdings | 8,747 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +14.07% | +20.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.24% | +35.98% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.27% | +8.31% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.14% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -18.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2011 | Aug 30, 2023 |
VXUS vs XOMO Performance
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year VXUS returned +27.24% while XOMO returned +35.98%. Year to date, VXUS is up 14.07% versus a gain of 20.33% for XOMO.
Over three years, VXUS compounded at +19.27% per year against +8.31% for XOMO. Across the full 3-year window we track, XOMO has the edge at +8.31% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for VXUS and -18.9% for XOMO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VXUS charges 0.05% per year while XOMO charges 1.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $125 annually, a gap of $120 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.60% against 39.96% for XOMO.
Holdings Overlap
VXUS and XOMO share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VXUS or XOMO?
VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while XOMO charges 1.25%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $120 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VXUS or XOMO?
Over the past year VXUS returned +27.24% vs +35.98% for XOMO, so XOMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), VXUS annualized +4.83% vs +8.31% for XOMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VXUS or XOMO?
XOMO has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: VXUS -39.9% vs XOMO -18.9%.
Should I hold both VXUS and XOMO?
VXUS and XOMO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and XOMO?
VXUS and XOMO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or XOMO?
VXUS yields 2.60% while XOMO yields 39.96%, so XOMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.