IVV vs XRPT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Volatility 2x XRP ETF
Which is better, IVV or XRPT?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XRPT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 3.13% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $84M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.75% |
| Holdings | 508 | 3 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | -70.89% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | -90.68% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 105.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -96.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,290Best | $1,103 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Volatility Shares, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 22, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 22, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.3 years).
IVV vs XRPT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XRPT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Volatility 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) is an ETF from Volatility Shares, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while XRPT returned -90.68%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a loss of 70.89% for XRPT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XRPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 105.6% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -96.7% for XRPT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XRPT charges 3.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $313 annually, a gap of $310 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.75% for XRPT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XRPT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XRPT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XRPT charges 3.13%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $310 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XRPT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs -90.68% for XRPT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +24.46% vs -81.65% for XRPT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XRPT?
XRPT has been the more volatile fund at 105.6% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs XRPT -96.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and XRPT?
IVV and XRPT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XRPT?
IVV yields 1.06% while XRPT yields 3.75%, so XRPT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XRPT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.