IVV vs XSHQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XSHQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.29% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $324M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.18% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 122 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +14.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +14.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +11.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +7.07% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 3, 2017 |
IVV vs XSHQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while XSHQ returned +14.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 14.64% for XSHQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +11.35% for XSHQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +7.07% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, XSHQ has the edge at +8.96% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSHQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.3% for XSHQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XSHQ charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.18% for XSHQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and XSHQ share 0 holdings out of 625 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XSHQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XSHQ charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or XSHQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +14.48% for XSHQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +8.96% for XSHQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or XSHQ?
XSHQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XSHQ -38.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and XSHQ?
IVV and XSHQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XSHQ?
IVV and XSHQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 625 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XSHQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while XSHQ yields 1.18%, so XSHQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.