SCHD vs XSHQ
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
Which is better, SCHD or XSHQ?
Large Cap Value against Small Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. XSHQ is less concentrated, with 22.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | XSHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.29% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $297M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 1.18% |
| Holdings | 103 | 122 |
| YTD Return | +25.07%Best | +10.41% |
| 1Y Return | +27.61%Best | +5.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.74%Best | +10.08% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.89%Best | +6.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7%Best | 19.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -38.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,025Best | $13,727 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 22.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Apr 3, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 6, 2017 to Sep 11, 2026 (9.4 years).
SCHD vs XSHQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.4 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs XSHQ Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +27.61% while XSHQ returned +5.28%. Year to date, SCHD is up 25.07% versus a gain of 10.41% for XSHQ.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.74% per year against +10.08% for XSHQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.89% and +6.54% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.50% annualized vs +8.47%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSHQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -38.3% for XSHQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XSHQ charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $29 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 1.18% for XSHQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings XSHQ also owns. 8.3% of XSHQ's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
XSHQ and SCHD share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 120 in XSHQ, against full books of 103 and 122.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 101 positions for XSHQ that do not appear in our book for SCHD (84.8% of the fund), and 87 for SCHD that do not appear in XSHQ (99.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in XSHQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCMoelis & Co | 0.12% | 1.82% | 1.70% |
| APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. | 0.07% | 1.61% | 1.54% |
| KFYKorn Ferry | 0.11% | 0.78% | 0.67% |
| RHIRobert Half International Inc. | 0.11% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
| WUWestern Union Co. | 0.05% | 0.66% | 0.61% |
| CNSCohen & Steers Inc | 0.05% | 0.58% | 0.53% |
| OFG:PROfg Bancorp | 0.05% | 0.44% | 0.39% |
| CHCOCity Holding Co Common Stock Usd2.5 | 0.05% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
| BKEBuckle Inc/the | 0.03% | 0.39% | 0.36% |
| LKFNLakeland Financial Corp. | 0.04% | 0.33% | 0.29% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and XSHQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or XSHQ?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XSHQ charges 0.29%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or XSHQ?
Over the past year SCHD returned +27.61% vs +5.28% for XSHQ, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), SCHD annualized +11.50% vs +8.47% for XSHQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or XSHQ?
XSHQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs XSHQ -38.3%.
Should I hold both SCHD and XSHQ?
SCHD and XSHQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and XSHQ?
8.3% of XSHQ's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 8.3% of XSHQ's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 120 in XSHQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XSHQ?
SCHD yields 3.00% while XSHQ yields 1.18%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XSHQ better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. XSHQ is less concentrated, with 22.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.