IVV vs XSVM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
Which is better, IVV or XSVM?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XSVM over 1Y. XSVM is less concentrated, with 15.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | XSVM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.37% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $633M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.80% |
| Holdings | 508 | 122 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +21.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.61% | +23.81%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98%Best | +14.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +8.78% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9%Best | 21.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -64.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $15,232 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 15.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 3, 2005 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 3, 2005 to Sep 9, 2026 (21.5 years).
IVV vs XSVM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs XSVM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while XSVM returned +23.81%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 21.44% for XSVM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +14.98% for XSVM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +8.78% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.33% annualized vs +7.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -64.1% for XSVM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while XSVM charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $37 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.80% for XSVM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 119 in XSVM, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 119 in XSVM, against full books of 508 and 122.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 114 positions for XSVM that do not appear in our book for IVV (95.0% of the fund), and 496 for IVV that do not appear in XSVM (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and XSVM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or XSVM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XSVM charges 0.37%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or XSVM?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +23.81% for XSVM, so XSVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IVV annualized +9.33% vs +7.80% for XSVM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or XSVM?
XSVM has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XSVM -64.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and XSVM?
IVV and XSVM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XSVM?
IVV yields 1.06% while XSVM yields 1.80%, so XSVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XSVM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, XSVM over 1Y. XSVM is less concentrated, with 15.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.