SCHD vs XSVM
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. XSVM delivered stronger 1-year returns. XSVM offers more diversification with 122 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | XSVM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.37% | |
| AUM | $108.7B | $671M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 1.74% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 122 | |
| YTD Return | +25.69% | +24.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.41% | +32.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.03% | +15.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.64% | +9.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 21.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -64.1% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Mar 3, 2005 |
SCHD vs XSVM Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +30.41% while XSVM returned +32.06%. Year to date, SCHD is up 25.69% versus a gain of 24.93% for XSVM.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +16.03% per year against +15.72% for XSVM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.64% and +9.50% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.46% annualized vs +7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -64.1% for XSVM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XSVM charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $37 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 1.74% for XSVM.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and XSVM share 8 holdings out of 212 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or XSVM?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XSVM charges 0.37%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or XSVM?
Over the past year SCHD returned +30.41% vs +32.06% for XSVM, so XSVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.46% vs +7.97% for XSVM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or XSVM?
XSVM has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs XSVM -64.1%.
Should I hold both SCHD and XSVM?
SCHD and XSVM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and XSVM?
SCHD and XSVM share 8 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 212 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XSVM?
SCHD yields 3.13% while XSVM yields 1.74%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.