IVV vs YRAM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax Memory and Storage Portfolio Option Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or YRAM?
Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 95.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | YRAM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $896.5B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.07% |
| Holdings | 508 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +12.95%Best | -10.10% |
| 1Y Return | +12.95% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.66% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.48% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.9%Best | 95.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Option Writing |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs YRAM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs YRAM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and YieldMax Memory and Storage Portfolio Option Income ETF (YRAM) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Year to date, IVV is up 12.95% versus a loss of 10.10% for YRAM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while YRAM charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $101 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.07% for YRAM.
Holdings Overlap
2.9% of IVV's money is in holdings YRAM also owns. 36.5% of YRAM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
5 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in YRAM, against full books of 508 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 506 and 43 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 495 positions YRAM does not, 96.5% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.29%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 3.68%, GOOGL 3.00%
36.5% of YRAM is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or YRAM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YRAM charges 1.01%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $98 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and YRAM?
36.5% of YRAM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 36.5% of YRAM's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 506 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in YRAM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or YRAM?
IVV yields 1.10% while YRAM yields 3.07%, so YRAM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is YRAM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 95.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.