IVV vs ZINC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Zacks Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or ZINC?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ZINC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 54 |
| YTD Return | +14.98%Best | +1.03% |
| 1Y Return | +17.32% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.33% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.95% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Zacks |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs ZINC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs ZINC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) is an ETF from Zacks. Year to date, IVV is up 14.98% versus a gain of 1.03% for ZINC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ZINC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $55 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for ZINC.
Holdings Overlap
At least 6.7% of IVV's money is in holdings ZINC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ZINC, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and ZINC share little of their money.
39 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 55 in ZINC, against full books of 508 and 54.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in ZINC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 4.31% | 2.87% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 0.17% | 4.55% | 4.38% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.61% | 3.39% | 2.78% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.18% | 3.24% | 3.06% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 0.28% | 3.14% | 2.86% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.03% | 2.88% | 2.85% |
| PNWPinnacle West Capital Corp. | 0.02% | 2.83% | 2.81% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 0.08% | 2.72% | 2.64% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.04% | 1.57% | 0.53% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.03% | 2.54% | 2.51% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and ZINC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ZINC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZINC charges 0.55%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ZINC?
At least 6.7% of IVV's money is in holdings ZINC also owns. Our book for ZINC is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 55 in ZINC.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ZINC?
IVV yields 1.06% while ZINC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZINC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.