SCHD vs ZINC

SCHD vs ZINC

Which is better, SCHD or ZINC?

Large Cap Value against All Cap Blend.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ZINC is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.

Lower Fees: SCHDLess Concentrated: ZINC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHDZINC
Expense Ratio0.06%Best0.55%
AUM$112.2B$9M
Dividend Yield3.13%0.00%
Holdings10354
YTD Return+28.59%Best+6.21%
1Y Return+31.77%-
3Y Return (annualized)+16.70%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.09%-
Top 10 Weight41.5%37.3%Best
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementZacks
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueAll Cap Blend
InceptionOct 20, 2011Jun 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SCHD vs ZINC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SCHD vs ZINC Performance

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) is an ETF from Zacks. Year to date, SCHD is up 28.59% versus a gain of 6.21% for ZINC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHD charges 0.06% per year while ZINC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $55 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.00% for ZINC.

Holdings Overlap

SCHD already in ZINC14.9%
ZINC already in SCHD25.6%

14.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings ZINC also owns. 25.6% of ZINC's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.

ZINC and SCHD share little of their money.

12 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 51 in ZINC, against full books of 103 and 54.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 30 positions for ZINC that do not appear in our book for SCHD (57.3% of the fund), and 86 for SCHD that do not appear in ZINC (85.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SCHDWeight in ZINCDifference
MOAltria Group Inc2.86%4.74%1.88%
CVXChevron Corp3.74%3.07%0.67%
VZVerizon Communic3.84%1.60%2.24%
FITBFifth Third Bancorp1.30%2.84%1.54%
TROWT Rowe Price Grp0.61%3.11%2.50%
GISGeneral Mills In0.49%2.51%2.02%
KMBKimberly-Clark Corp.0.91%1.90%0.99%
BBYBest Buy Co. Inc.0.40%1.75%1.35%
WUWestern Union0.06%1.41%1.35%
FNFFidelity Nationa0.32%0.84%0.52%

25.6% of ZINC is already inside SCHD.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SCHDZINC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHD or ZINC?

SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while ZINC charges 0.55%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and ZINC?

25.6% of ZINC's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 25.6% of ZINC's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 51 in ZINC.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or ZINC?

SCHD yields 3.13% while ZINC yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZINC better than SCHD?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ZINC is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.