IWN vs VTI
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IWN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14.7B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,408 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.72% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.44% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.15% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.13% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
IWN vs VTI Performance
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWN returned +37.44% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IWN is up 23.72% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IWN compounded at +19.15% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.13% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.9% for IWN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWN charges 0.24% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $3 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWN currently yields 1.44% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IWN and VTI share 888 holdings out of 3133 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWN or VTI?
IWN has an expense ratio of 0.24% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IWN or VTI?
Over the past year IWN returned +37.44% vs +22.35% for VTI, so IWN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IWN annualized +7.92% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IWN or VTI?
IWN has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IWN -62.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IWN and VTI?
IWN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IWN and VTI?
IWN and VTI share 888 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3133 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWN or VTI?
IWN yields 1.44% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IWN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.