IWN vs VTI
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IWN or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IWN led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.24% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14.3B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,408 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +20.50%Best | +11.65% |
| 1Y Return | +27.49%Best | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.04% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.50% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.9% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,037 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 10, 2026 (25.3 years).
IWN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
IWN vs VTI Performance
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWN returned +27.49% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, IWN is up 20.50% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, IWN compounded at +18.04% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.50% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.01% annualized vs +7.19%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.9% for IWN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWN charges 0.24% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $24 vs $3 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWN currently yields 1.44% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 72.5% of IWN's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of IWN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
1,002 positions in common, counted across the 1,384 positions we hold weights for in IWN and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 1,408 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IWN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VSATViasat Inc | 0.66% | 0.02% | 0.64% |
| CYTKCytokinetics Inc | 0.59% | 0.02% | 0.57% |
| ONBOld National Bancorp/In Common Stock | 0.53% | 0.01% | 0.52% |
| TEXTerex Corp | 0.48% | 0.01% | 0.47% |
| TRNOTerreno Realty Corp | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.47% |
| MACMacerich Co. | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.46% |
| CMCCommercial Metals Co | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.45% |
| EPRTEssential Properties Realty Trust Inc | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| SWXSouthwest Gas Corp. | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| SMSm Energy Co | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.43% |
72.5% of IWN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWN or VTI?
IWN has an expense ratio of 0.24% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IWN or VTI?
Over the past year IWN returned +27.49% vs +17.34% for VTI, so IWN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IWN annualized +7.19% vs +8.01% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IWN or VTI?
IWN has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IWN -62.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IWN and VTI?
IWN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IWN and VTI?
At least 72.5% of IWN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1,002 positions in common, counted across the 1,384 positions we hold weights for in IWN and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWN or VTI?
IWN yields 1.44% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IWN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IWN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IWN led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.