JANH vs QQQ
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, JANH or QQQ?
Option Writing against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JANH | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 14 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +1.87% | +15.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.02% | +22.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.15% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $10,193 | $17,882Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.7 years).
JANH vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JANH vs QQQ Performance
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January (JANH) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JANH returned +0.02% while QQQ returned +22.63%. Year to date, JANH is up 1.87% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 4.3% for JANH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for JANH and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JANH charges 0.79% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $18 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANH currently yields 6.15% against 0.44% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JANH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JANH or QQQ?
JANH has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JANH or QQQ?
Over the past year JANH returned +0.02% vs +22.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JANH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 4.3% for JANH. Worst drawdown: JANH -10.4% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both JANH and QQQ?
JANH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JANH or QQQ?
JANH yields 6.15% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so JANH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than JANH?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.