JANZ vs VXUS
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JANZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $41M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.52% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.73% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.92% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
JANZ vs VXUS Performance
TrueShares Structured Outcome (January) ETF (JANZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JANZ returned +15.73% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, JANZ is up 10.52% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, JANZ compounded at +14.92% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.04% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, JANZ has the edge at +11.66% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.9% for JANZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.1% for JANZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JANZ charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JANZ currently yields 1.32% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
JANZ and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JANZ or VXUS?
JANZ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JANZ or VXUS?
Over the past year JANZ returned +15.73% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), JANZ annualized +11.66% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JANZ or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.9% for JANZ. Worst drawdown: JANZ -18.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both JANZ and VXUS?
JANZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JANZ and VXUS?
JANZ and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JANZ or VXUS?
JANZ yields 1.32% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.