JEMA vs QQQ
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, JEMA or QQQ?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. JEMA led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. JEMA is less concentrated, with 39.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JEMA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1.7B | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.41% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 543 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +21.45%Best | +15.18% |
| 1Y Return | +33.45%Best | +19.65% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.01% | +24.60%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.24% | +13.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7%Best | 20.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.5% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,184 | $19,204Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.4%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 11, 2021 to Sep 15, 2026 (5.5 years).
JEMA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.5 years both funds cover.
JEMA vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JEMA returned +33.45% while QQQ returned +19.65%. Year to date, JEMA is up 21.45% versus a gain of 15.18% for QQQ.
Over three years, JEMA compounded at +23.01% per year against +24.60% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.24% and +13.94% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +16.20% annualized vs +6.23%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 17.7% for JEMA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.5% for JEMA and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JEMA charges 0.34% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $18 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JEMA currently yields 2.41% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
0.6% of JEMA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 1.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings JEMA also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 492 positions we hold weights for in JEMA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 543 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 94 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for JEMA (96.8% of the fund), and 18 for JEMA that do not appear in QQQ (5.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JEMA and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JEMA or QQQ?
JEMA has an expense ratio of 0.34% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JEMA or QQQ?
Over the past year JEMA returned +33.45% vs +19.65% for QQQ, so JEMA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), JEMA annualized +6.23% vs +16.20% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JEMA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 17.7% for JEMA. Worst drawdown: JEMA -39.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both JEMA and QQQ?
JEMA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JEMA or QQQ?
JEMA yields 2.41% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so JEMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than JEMA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. JEMA led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. JEMA is less concentrated, with 39.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.