JEMA vs QQQ
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. JEMA delivered stronger 1-year returns. JEMA offers more diversification with 517 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JEMA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.41% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 517 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +23.76% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.59% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.27% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.22% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
JEMA vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JEMA returned +44.59% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, JEMA is up 23.76% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, JEMA compounded at +24.27% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.22% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.8% for JEMA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.5% for JEMA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JEMA charges 0.34% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $18 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JEMA currently yields 2.41% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
JEMA and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JEMA or QQQ?
JEMA has an expense ratio of 0.34% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JEMA or QQQ?
Over the past year JEMA returned +44.59% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so JEMA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), JEMA annualized +6.68% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JEMA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.8% for JEMA. Worst drawdown: JEMA -39.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both JEMA and QQQ?
JEMA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JEMA and QQQ?
JEMA and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JEMA or QQQ?
JEMA yields 2.41% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so JEMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.