JFR vs VOO
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JFR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 5.52% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.89% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 450 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.73% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.46% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.47% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.41% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2004 | Sep 7, 2010 |
JFR vs VOO Performance
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund (JFR) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JFR returned +4.46% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, JFR is up 7.73% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, JFR compounded at +11.47% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.41% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.0% for JFR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JFR charges 5.52% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $552 vs $3 annually, a gap of $549 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JFR currently yields 11.89% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
JFR and VOO share 1 holdings out of 774 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JFR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYB | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JFR or VOO?
JFR has an expense ratio of 5.52% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $549 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JFR or VOO?
Over the past year JFR returned +4.46% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), JFR annualized -0.33% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JFR or VOO?
JFR has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: JFR -69.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both JFR and VOO?
JFR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JFR and VOO?
JFR and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 774 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JFR or VOO?
JFR yields 11.89% while VOO yields 1.09%, so JFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.