JPEM vs QQQ
JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. JPEM offers more diversification with 517 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPEM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $385M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.71% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 574 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.50% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.66% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.77% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.05% | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 7, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
JPEM vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JPEM returned +17.66% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, JPEM is up 8.50% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, JPEM compounded at +13.77% per year against +25.79% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.05% and +15.20% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs +4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.1% for JPEM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.8% for JPEM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPEM charges 0.44% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $18 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPEM currently yields 4.71% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
JPEM and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 620 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPEM or QQQ?
JPEM has an expense ratio of 0.44% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JPEM or QQQ?
Over the past year JPEM returned +17.66% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), JPEM annualized +4.36% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JPEM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.1% for JPEM. Worst drawdown: JPEM -43.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both JPEM and QQQ?
JPEM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JPEM and QQQ?
JPEM and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 620 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPEM or QQQ?
JPEM yields 4.71% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so JPEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.