JPEM vs VXUS

Quick Verdict

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: VXUSMore Diversified: VXUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJPEMVXUSWinner
Expense Ratio0.44%0.05%
AUM$385M$156.5B
Dividend Yield4.71%2.60%
Holdings5748,747
YTD Return+9.55%+14.57%
1Y Return+19.60%+27.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.97%+19.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.36%+9.28%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%15.1%
Max Drawdown-43.8%-39.9%
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 7, 2015Jan 26, 2011

JPEM vs VXUS Performance

JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JPEM returned +19.60% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, JPEM is up 9.55% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.

Over three years, JPEM compounded at +13.97% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.36% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

JPEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.8% for JPEM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JPEM charges 0.44% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $5 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPEM currently yields 4.71% against 2.60% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

5.0%overlap

JPEM and VXUS share 392 holdings out of 7986 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JPEMWeight in VXUSDifference
VALE3:BV1.27%0.14%1.13%
ITUB4:BV1.06%0.11%0.95%
3988:HK0.98%0.09%0.89%
NPN:ZAProProPro
2454:TWProProPro
GFNORTEO:MXProProPro
GMEXICOB:MXProProPro
2891:TWProProPro
1398:HKProProPro
OTPB:HUProProPro
See all 10 holdings JPEM shares with VXUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JPEM or VXUS?

JPEM has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.

Which performed better, JPEM or VXUS?

Over the past year JPEM returned +19.60% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), JPEM annualized +4.45% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, JPEM or VXUS?

JPEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: JPEM -43.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both JPEM and VXUS?

JPEM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between JPEM and VXUS?

JPEM and VXUS share 392 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7986 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, JPEM or VXUS?

JPEM yields 4.71% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so JPEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →