JRS vs VTI
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JRS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.40% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 87 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.94% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.09% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.87% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.75% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Nuveen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2001 | May 24, 2001 |
JRS vs VTI Performance
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS) is a ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JRS returned +21.09% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, JRS is up 16.94% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, JRS compounded at +14.87% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.75% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.2% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.7% for JRS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
JRS and VTI share 40 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, JRS or VTI?
Over the past year JRS returned +21.09% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), JRS annualized -0.49% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JRS or VTI?
JRS has been the more volatile fund at 28.2% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: JRS -90.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both JRS and VTI?
JRS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JRS and VTI?
JRS and VTI share 40 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JRS or VTI?
JRS yields 7.40% while VTI yields 1.07%, so JRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.