KBWY vs VTI

KBWY vs VTI

Which is better, KBWY or VTI?

Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. KBWY led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKBWYVTI
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%Best
AUM$300M$690.1B
Dividend Yield8.31%1.03%
Holdings323,524
YTD Return+12.52%+13.83%Best
1Y Return+16.16%Best+15.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+7.97%+22.56%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+0.88%+12.44%Best
Volatility (annualized)22.2%14.5%Best
Max Drawdown-64.3%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$10,448$17,972Best
Top 10 Weight46.5%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 2, 2010May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 2, 2010 to Oct 8, 2026 (15.8 years).

KBWY vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.8 years both funds cover.

KBWY vs VTI Performance

Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF (KBWY) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBWY returned +16.16% while VTI returned +15.70%. Year to date, KBWY is up 12.52% versus a gain of 13.83% for VTI.

Over three years, KBWY compounded at +7.97% per year against +22.56% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.88% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.54% annualized vs +0.17%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

KBWY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 14.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.3% for KBWY and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KBWY charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBWY currently yields 8.31% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

KBWY already in VTI100.0%
VTI already in KBWY0.1%

100.0% of KBWY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings KBWY also owns.

Most of KBWY is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, KBWY as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

28 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in KBWY and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,142 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KBWY (97.3% of the fund), and 0 for KBWY that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in KBWYWeight in VTIDifference
IIPRInnovative Industrial Properties Inc6.35%0.00%6.35%
MRPMillrose Properties Inc5.66%0.01%5.65%
PKPark Hotels And Resorts Inc Reit USD .015.19%0.00%5.19%
GOODGladstone Commercial Corporation4.79%0.00%4.79%
CHCTCommunity Healthcare Trust Inc4.73%0.00%4.73%
HIWHighwoods Properties Inc4.54%0.01%4.53%
GNLGlobal Net Lease Cumulative Rede3.91%0.00%3.91%
AHHArmada Hoffler Properties Inc3.81%0.00%3.81%
CTOCTO Realty Growth, Inc.3.79%0.00%3.79%
DEAEasterly Government Properties Inc3.74%0.00%3.74%

100.0% of KBWY is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

KBWYVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KBWY or VTI?

KBWY has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, KBWY or VTI?

Over the past year KBWY returned +16.16% vs +15.70% for VTI, so KBWY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), KBWY annualized +0.17% vs +12.54% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, KBWY or VTI?

KBWY has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 14.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KBWY -64.3% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both KBWY and VTI?

KBWY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between KBWY and VTI?

100.0% of KBWY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings KBWY also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in KBWY and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, KBWY or VTI?

KBWY yields 8.31% while VTI yields 1.03%, so KBWY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than KBWY?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. KBWY led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.