KBWY vs VTI
Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KBWY delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KBWY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $312M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.03% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.57% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.47% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.69% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.93% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
KBWY vs VTI Performance
Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF (KBWY) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KBWY returned +26.47% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, KBWY is up 23.57% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, KBWY compounded at +9.69% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.93% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KBWY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.3% for KBWY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KBWY charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KBWY currently yields 8.03% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KBWY and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KBWY or VTI?
KBWY has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KBWY or VTI?
Over the past year KBWY returned +26.47% vs +22.35% for VTI, so KBWY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), KBWY annualized +0.77% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KBWY or VTI?
KBWY has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KBWY -64.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KBWY and VTI?
KBWY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KBWY and VTI?
KBWY and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KBWY or VTI?
KBWY yields 8.03% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KBWY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.