KJD vs QQQ
KraneShares 2x Long JD Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, KJD or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KJD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 4 | 208 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.5% | 22.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $5,847 | $11,823Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 16 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. KJD has data through Oct 26, 2026 and QQQ through Nov 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 15, 2025 to Oct 26, 2026 (1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KJD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.5% compared with 22.4% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for KJD and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KJD charges 1.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $18 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KJD currently yields 0.00% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in KJD and 101 in QQQ, totalling 200.0% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in KJD and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 4 and 208.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KJD and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KJD or QQQ?
KJD has an expense ratio of 1.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, KJD or QQQ?
KJD has been the more volatile fund at 87.5% annualized versus 22.4% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: KJD -51.1% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both KJD and QQQ?
KJD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KJD or QQQ?
KJD yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than KJD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.