KJD vs VTI
KraneShares 2x Long JD Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KJD or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KJD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,524 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.5% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -51.1% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $5,847 | $11,520Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 10 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. KJD has data through Oct 26, 2026 and VTI through Nov 5, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 15, 2025 to Oct 26, 2026 (1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KJD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.5% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.1% for KJD and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.12. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KJD charges 1.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $3 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KJD currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in KJD and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 200.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in KJD and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 4 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KJD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KJD or VTI?
KJD has an expense ratio of 1.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $122 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, KJD or VTI?
KJD has been the more volatile fund at 87.5% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KJD -51.1% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both KJD and VTI?
KJD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.12, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KJD or VTI?
KJD yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KJD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.