KJD vs VOO
KraneShares 2x Long JD Daily ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, KJD or VOO?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KJD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 2 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -21.66% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | -40.19% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.63% |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KJD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KJD vs VOO Performance
KraneShares 2x Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KJD returned -40.19% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, KJD is down 21.66% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KJD charges 1.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $3 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KJD currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in KJD and 494 in VOO, totalling 200.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in KJD and 494 in VOO, against full books of 2 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KJD and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KJD or VOO?
KJD has an expense ratio of 1.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $122 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KJD or VOO?
Over the past year KJD returned -40.19% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KJD or VOO?
KJD yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than KJD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.