KONG vs SCHD
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, KONG or SCHD?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KONG is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KONG | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 61 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +7.80% | +21.99%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.97% | +25.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.68% | +15.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.23% | +9.48%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -16.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,528 | $15,728Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.7%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Formidable Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 21, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 22, 2021 to Sep 23, 2026 (5.2 years).
KONG vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
KONG vs SCHD Performance
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is an ETF from Formidable Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KONG returned +7.97% while SCHD returned +25.92%. Year to date, KONG is up 7.80% versus a gain of 21.99% for SCHD.
Over three years, KONG compounded at +9.68% per year against +15.66% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +6.23% and +9.48% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 12.3% for KONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for KONG and -16.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KONG charges 0.89% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $6 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KONG currently yields 0.34% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
9.2% of KONG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 4.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings KONG also owns.
KONG and SCHD share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in KONG and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 61 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for KONG (95.3% of the fund), and 31 for KONG that do not appear in SCHD (88.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KONG and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KONG or SCHD?
KONG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $83 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KONG or SCHD?
Over the past year KONG returned +7.97% vs +25.92% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KONG or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 12.3% for KONG. Worst drawdown: KONG -20.0% vs SCHD -16.9%.
Should I hold both KONG and SCHD?
KONG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KONG and SCHD?
9.2% of KONG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 4.7% of SCHD's is in holdings KONG also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in KONG and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, KONG or SCHD?
KONG yields 0.34% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than KONG?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KONG is less concentrated, with 41.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.