KONG vs SCHD
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KONG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $22M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +8.96% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.06% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.04% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.03% | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Formidable Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 21, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
KONG vs SCHD Performance
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is a ETF from Formidable Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KONG returned +11.06% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, KONG is up 8.96% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, KONG compounded at +9.04% per year against +15.40% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +6.03% and +9.70% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.45% annualized vs +6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 12.4% for KONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for KONG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KONG charges 0.89% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $6 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KONG currently yields 0.36% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
KONG and SCHD share 5 holdings out of 127 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KONG or SCHD?
KONG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KONG or SCHD?
Over the past year KONG returned +11.06% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KONG annualized +6.19% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KONG or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 12.4% for KONG. Worst drawdown: KONG -20.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KONG and SCHD?
KONG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KONG and SCHD?
KONG and SCHD share 5 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 127 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KONG or SCHD?
KONG yields 0.36% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.