KONG vs VTI
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KONG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $23M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 61 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.16% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.10% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.05% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.63% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Formidable Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 21, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
KONG vs VTI Performance
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is a ETF from Formidable Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KONG returned +9.10% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, KONG is up 8.16% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, KONG compounded at +9.05% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.63% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.3% for KONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for KONG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KONG charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KONG currently yields 0.35% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KONG and VTI share 32 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KONG or VTI?
KONG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KONG or VTI?
Over the past year KONG returned +9.10% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), KONG annualized +6.00% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KONG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.3% for KONG. Worst drawdown: KONG -20.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KONG and VTI?
KONG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KONG and VTI?
KONG and VTI share 32 common holdings with a 14.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KONG or VTI?
KONG yields 0.35% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.