KSTR vs VTI
KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KSTR or VTI?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KSTR led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KSTR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $410M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +21.32%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +20.51%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.74%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.05% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3351.5% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,025 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 25, 2026 (25.3 years).
KSTR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
KSTR vs VTI Performance
KraneShares China Technology & Semiconductor STAR 50 Index ETF (KSTR) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KSTR returned +20.51% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, KSTR is up 21.32% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, KSTR compounded at +23.74% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.05% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -7.60%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KSTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 3351.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KSTR charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KSTR currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in KSTR and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 99.2% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in KSTR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 53 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KSTR (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for KSTR that do not appear in VTI (2.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KSTR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KSTR or VTI?
KSTR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KSTR or VTI?
Over the past year KSTR returned +20.51% vs +18.17% for VTI, so KSTR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), KSTR annualized -7.60% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KSTR or VTI?
KSTR has been the more volatile fund at 3351.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI.
Should I hold both KSTR and VTI?
KSTR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KSTR or VTI?
KSTR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KSTR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KSTR led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.