LABX vs VTI

LABX vs VTI

Which is better, LABX or VTI?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLABXVTI
Expense Ratio1.30%0.03%Best
AUM$50M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings43,543
YTD Return-36.70%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-75.85%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)314.4%12.7%Best
Max Drawdown-96.4%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$3,925$12,014Best
Fund FamilyTradr ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 11, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 12, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.1 years).

LABX vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

LABX vs VTI Performance

Tradr 2X Long ALAB Daily ETF (LABX) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LABX returned -75.85% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, LABX is down 36.70% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LABX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 314.4% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.4% for LABX and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LABX charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LABX currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of LABX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

LABXVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LABX or VTI?

LABX has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, LABX or VTI?

Over the past year LABX returned -75.85% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LABX annualized -57.27% vs +18.15% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, LABX or VTI?

LABX has been the more volatile fund at 314.4% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LABX -96.4% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both LABX and VTI?

LABX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, LABX or VTI?

LABX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than LABX?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.