LCTD vs VOO
iShares World ex US Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCTD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.22% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $282M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.39% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 367 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.22% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.13% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.93% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.91% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 6, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LCTD vs VOO Performance
iShares World ex US Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF (LCTD) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCTD returned +22.13% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, LCTD is up 11.22% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, LCTD compounded at +16.93% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.91% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LCTD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for LCTD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCTD charges 0.22% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $3 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCTD currently yields 3.39% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LCTD and VOO share 3 holdings out of 848 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCTD or VOO?
LCTD has an expense ratio of 0.22% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $19 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LCTD or VOO?
Over the past year LCTD returned +22.13% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), LCTD annualized +8.51% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LCTD or VOO?
LCTD has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LCTD -29.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LCTD and VOO?
LCTD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LCTD and VOO?
LCTD and VOO share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 848 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCTD or VOO?
LCTD yields 3.39% while VOO yields 1.09%, so LCTD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.