LFDR vs VOO
LFDR vs VOO
LifeX Durable Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFDR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $822,715.73 | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.50% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -5.52% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.84% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Stone Ridge Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 8, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LFDR vs VOO Performance
LifeX Durable Income ETF (LFDR) is a ETF from Stone Ridge Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFDR returned -3.84% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, LFDR is down 5.52% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.2% for LFDR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for LFDR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFDR charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFDR currently yields 8.50% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LFDR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 519 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFDR or VOO?
LFDR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFDR or VOO?
Over the past year LFDR returned -3.84% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFDR annualized -1.41% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFDR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.2% for LFDR. Worst drawdown: LFDR -9.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LFDR and VOO?
LFDR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFDR and VOO?
LFDR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 519 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFDR or VOO?
LFDR yields 8.50% while VOO yields 1.09%, so LFDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.