LFDR vs VXUS
LFDR vs VXUS
LifeX Durable Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LFDR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $822,715.73 | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.50% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -5.52% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.84% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Stone Ridge Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 8, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
LFDR vs VXUS Performance
LifeX Durable Income ETF (LFDR) is a ETF from Stone Ridge Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LFDR returned -3.84% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, LFDR is down 5.52% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 8.2% for LFDR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for LFDR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LFDR charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LFDR currently yields 8.50% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
LFDR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7875 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LFDR or VXUS?
LFDR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LFDR or VXUS?
Over the past year LFDR returned -3.84% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LFDR annualized -1.41% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LFDR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 8.2% for LFDR. Worst drawdown: LFDR -9.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both LFDR and VXUS?
LFDR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LFDR and VXUS?
LFDR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7875 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LFDR or VXUS?
LFDR yields 8.50% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so LFDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.