LIBD vs VOO
LIBD vs VOO
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LIBD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.80% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 20 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -4.40% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.38% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Stone Ridge Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 6, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LIBD vs VOO Performance
LifeX 2065 Inflation-Protected Longevity Income ETF (LIBD) is a ETF from Stone Ridge Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LIBD returned -3.38% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, LIBD is down 4.40% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.8% for LIBD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for LIBD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LIBD charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LIBD currently yields 11.80% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LIBD and VOO share 0 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LIBD or VOO?
LIBD has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LIBD or VOO?
Over the past year LIBD returned -3.38% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LIBD annualized -0.47% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LIBD or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.8% for LIBD. Worst drawdown: LIBD -8.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LIBD and VOO?
LIBD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LIBD and VOO?
LIBD and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LIBD or VOO?
LIBD yields 11.80% while VOO yields 1.09%, so LIBD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.