LIT vs SCHD
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. LIT delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LIT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 45 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +14.01% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +67.09% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.82% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.89% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2010 | Oct 20, 2011 |
LIT vs SCHD Performance
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year LIT returned +67.09% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, LIT is up 14.01% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, LIT compounded at +9.82% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -0.89% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +5.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.3% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.9% for LIT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LIT charges 0.75% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $6 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LIT currently yields 0.72% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
LIT and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 139 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LIT or SCHD?
LIT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LIT or SCHD?
Over the past year LIT returned +67.09% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so LIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), LIT annualized +5.71% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LIT or SCHD?
LIT has been the more volatile fund at 28.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: LIT -65.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both LIT and SCHD?
LIT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LIT and SCHD?
LIT and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 139 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LIT or SCHD?
LIT yields 0.72% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.