LIT vs VOO
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LIT or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LIT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LIT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 45 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.83% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | +44.15%Best | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.32% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.74% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.2% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -65.9% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,160 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.8% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 8, 2026 (16 years).
LIT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
LIT vs VOO Performance
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LIT returned +44.15% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, LIT is up 11.83% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Over three years, LIT compounded at +9.32% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -1.74% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.43% annualized vs +5.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.9% for LIT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LIT charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LIT currently yields 0.72% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
8.4% of LIT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.9% of VOO's money is in holdings LIT also owns.
LIT and VOO share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in LIT and 504 in VOO, against full books of 45 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for LIT (97.5% of the fund), and 3 for LIT that do not appear in VOO (25.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LIT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LIT or VOO?
LIT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LIT or VOO?
Over the past year LIT returned +44.15% vs +19.43% for VOO, so LIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), LIT annualized +5.11% vs +13.43% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LIT or VOO?
LIT has been the more volatile fund at 28.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LIT -65.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LIT and VOO?
LIT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LIT and VOO?
8.4% of LIT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.9% of VOO's is in holdings LIT also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in LIT and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LIT or VOO?
LIT yields 0.72% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LIT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LIT led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.