LIT vs VOO
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. LIT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LIT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 45 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.17% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +61.13% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.65% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.91% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LIT vs VOO Performance
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LIT returned +61.13% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, LIT is up 12.17% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, LIT compounded at +9.65% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.91% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.9% for LIT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LIT charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LIT currently yields 0.72% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LIT or VOO?
LIT has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LIT or VOO?
Over the past year LIT returned +61.13% vs +20.69% for VOO, so LIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), LIT annualized +5.60% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LIT or VOO?
LIT has been the more volatile fund at 28.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LIT -65.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LIT and VOO?
LIT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LIT and VOO?
LIT and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LIT or VOO?
LIT yields 0.72% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.