LJAN vs VOO

LJAN vs VOO

Which is better, LJAN or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLJANVOO
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$12M$997.4B
Dividend Yield4.94%1.04%
Holdings15509
YTD Return+0.79%+12.37%Best
1Y Return+0.06%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Volatility (annualized)1.8%Best12.0%
Max Drawdown-5.9%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 2.7 years$10,103$16,653Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 2, 2024Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.7 years).

LJAN vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

LJAN vs VOO Performance

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LJAN returned +0.06% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, LJAN is up 0.79% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 1.8% for LJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.9% for LJAN and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LJAN charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LJAN currently yields 4.94% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of LJAN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

LJANVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LJAN or VOO?

LJAN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, LJAN or VOO?

Over the past year LJAN returned +0.06% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, LJAN or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 1.8% for LJAN. Worst drawdown: LJAN -5.9% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both LJAN and VOO?

LJAN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, LJAN or VOO?

LJAN yields 4.94% while VOO yields 1.04%, so LJAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than LJAN?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.