LSST vs VTI
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSST | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.59% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 235 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.89% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.37% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.14% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.47% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 27, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
LSST vs VTI Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST) is a ETF from Natixis Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSST returned +7.37% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, LSST is up 4.89% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, LSST compounded at +2.14% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.47% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +2.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 2.4% for LSST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.2% for LSST and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSST charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSST currently yields 4.59% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSST or VTI?
LSST has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSST or VTI?
Over the past year LSST returned +7.37% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), LSST annualized +2.64% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSST or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 2.4% for LSST. Worst drawdown: LSST -6.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LSST and VTI?
LSST and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSST or VTI?
LSST yields 4.59% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LSST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.