LSST vs VOO
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSST | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.59% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 235 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.89% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.37% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.14% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.47% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 27, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LSST vs VOO Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST) is a ETF from Natixis Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSST returned +7.37% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, LSST is up 4.89% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, LSST compounded at +2.14% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.47% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +2.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 2.4% for LSST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.2% for LSST and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSST charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSST currently yields 4.59% against 1.09% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSST or VOO?
LSST has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSST or VOO?
Over the past year LSST returned +7.37% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), LSST annualized +2.64% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSST or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 2.4% for LSST. Worst drawdown: LSST -6.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LSST and VOO?
LSST and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSST or VOO?
LSST yields 4.59% while VOO yields 1.09%, so LSST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.