IVV vs LSST
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LSST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.59% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 235 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +4.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +7.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +2.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +2.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 2.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -6.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Natixis Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 27, 2017 |
IVV vs LSST Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST) is a ETF from Natixis Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while LSST returned +7.37%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 4.89% for LSST.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +2.14% for LSST; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +2.47% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +2.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.4% for LSST. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -6.2% for LSST. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LSST charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.59% for LSST.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LSST?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LSST charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LSST?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +7.37% for LSST, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +2.64% for LSST. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LSST?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.4% for LSST. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LSST -6.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and LSST?
IVV and LSST have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LSST?
IVV yields 1.09% while LSST yields 4.59%, so LSST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.