MAGC vs VTI
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAGC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $14M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.71% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -19.32% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.41% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MAGC vs VTI Performance
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAGC returned -22.41% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, MAGC is down 19.32% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAGC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for MAGC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAGC charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAGC currently yields 4.71% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MAGC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAGC or VTI?
MAGC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MAGC or VTI?
Over the past year MAGC returned -22.41% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAGC annualized -11.41% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MAGC or VTI?
MAGC has been the more volatile fund at 28.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MAGC -44.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MAGC and VTI?
MAGC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MAGC and VTI?
MAGC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAGC or VTI?
MAGC yields 4.71% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MAGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.