MCHS vs VXUS
MCHS vs VXUS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MCHS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCHS | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $20M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.56% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +27.51% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.08% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Matthews Asia Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MCHS vs VXUS Performance
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) is a ETF from Matthews Asia Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MCHS returned +39.08% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MCHS is up 27.51% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCHS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.8% for MCHS and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCHS charges 0.89% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $5 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCHS currently yields 1.56% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MCHS and VXUS share 33 holdings out of 7879 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MCHS | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3393:HK | 5.70% | 0.00% | 5.70% |
| ATAT:SH | 4.70% | 0.01% | 4.69% |
| 3081:TW | 4.00% | 0.01% | 3.99% |
| 425:HK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 1729:HK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 300487:SH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 605376:SH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 1308:HK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 605111:SH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| 1888:HK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings MCHS shares with VXUS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCHS or VXUS?
MCHS has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MCHS or VXUS?
Over the past year MCHS returned +39.08% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so MCHS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), MCHS annualized +28.44% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MCHS or VXUS?
MCHS has been the more volatile fund at 29.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MCHS -24.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MCHS and VXUS?
MCHS and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MCHS and VXUS?
MCHS and VXUS share 33 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7879 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCHS or VXUS?
MCHS yields 1.56% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.