MCI vs QQQ

MCI vs QQQ

Which is better, MCI or QQQ?

We do not have enough on MCI and QQQ to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMCIQQQ
Expense Ratio-0.18%
AUM-$483.5B
Dividend Yield-0.44%
Holdings-107
YTD Price Return-+17.67%
1Y Price Return-+21.19%
3Y Price Return (annualized)-+24.96%
5Y Price Return (annualized)-+14.57%
Volatility (annualized)-30.6%
Max Drawdown--83.0%
Fund FamilyBARINGS CORPORATE INVESTORSInvesco (US)
Category-Equity
Style-Large Cap Growth
Inception-Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for MCI. We have no price series for MCI, so there is nothing to compare it against.

MCI vs QQQ Performance

BARINGS CORPORATE INVESTORS (MCI) is an ETF from BARINGS CORPORATE INVESTORS and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US).

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MCI and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MCIQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is QQQ better than MCI?

We hold very little data on MCI and QQQ, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.