METD vs QQQ
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METD | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $10M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +9.92% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.75% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
METD vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year METD returned +25.75% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, METD is up 9.92% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 29.6% for METD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for METD and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METD charges 1.02% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $18 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METD currently yields 2.51% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
METD and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METD or QQQ?
METD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METD or QQQ?
Over the past year METD returned +25.75% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), METD annualized -10.84% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 29.6% for METD. Worst drawdown: METD -46.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both METD and QQQ?
METD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METD and QQQ?
METD and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METD or QQQ?
METD yields 2.51% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so METD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.