METD vs QQQ
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, METD or QQQ?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.50, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 8 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -7.70% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.80% | +22.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.0% | 17.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $6,478 | $15,710Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.3 years).
METD vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
METD vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year METD returned +5.80% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, METD is down 7.70% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.0% compared with 17.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for METD and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.50. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METD charges 1.02% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $18 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METD currently yields 2.59% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in METD and 102 in QQQ, totalling 95.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in METD and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 8 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of METD and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METD or QQQ?
METD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $84 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, METD or QQQ?
Over the past year METD returned +5.80% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), METD annualized -17.20% vs +21.70% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, METD or QQQ?
METD has been the more volatile fund at 30.0% annualized versus 17.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: METD -46.0% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both METD and QQQ?
METD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.50, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, METD or QQQ?
METD yields 2.59% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so METD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than METD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.50, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.