METD vs VTI
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. METD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.51% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.92% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.75% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
METD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METD returned +25.75% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, METD is up 9.92% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for METD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METD charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METD currently yields 2.51% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
METD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METD or VTI?
METD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METD or VTI?
Over the past year METD returned +25.75% vs +21.39% for VTI, so METD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), METD annualized -10.84% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METD or VTI?
METD has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: METD -46.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both METD and VTI?
METD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METD and VTI?
METD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METD or VTI?
METD yields 2.51% while VTI yields 1.07%, so METD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.