METU vs VOO
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $437M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.61% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -41.23% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -58.71% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 62.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
METU vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year METU returned -58.71% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, METU is down 41.23% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 62.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.9% for METU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METU charges 1.02% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METU currently yields 4.61% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
METU and VOO share 1 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in METU | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| META | 17.67% | 1.92% | 15.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METU or VOO?
METU has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, METU or VOO?
Over the past year METU returned -58.71% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), METU annualized -14.39% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, METU or VOO?
METU has been the more volatile fund at 62.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: METU -63.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both METU and VOO?
METU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between METU and VOO?
METU and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, METU or VOO?
METU yields 4.61% while VOO yields 1.08%, so METU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.