MLCC vs SCHD
Global X MLCC & Electronic Components ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, MLCC or SCHD?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 91.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MLCC | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $111.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.24% |
| Holdings | 15 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +1.70% | +24.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +29.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.54% |
| Top 10 Weight | 91.2% | 41.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
MLCC vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
MLCC vs SCHD Performance
Global X MLCC & Electronic Components ETF (MLCC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, MLCC is up 1.70% versus a gain of 24.55% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MLCC charges 0.75% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $6 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MLCC currently yields 0.00% against 3.24% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 15 holdings in MLCC and 98 in SCHD, totalling 99.9% and 99.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 15 positions we hold weights for in MLCC and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 15 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 97 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for MLCC (99.8% of the fund), and 0 for MLCC that do not appear in SCHD (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MLCC and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MLCC or SCHD?
MLCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, MLCC or SCHD?
MLCC yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than MLCC?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 91.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.