MLPD vs VTI
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MLPD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $29M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.51% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.24% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.28% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
MLPD vs VTI Performance
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MLPD returned +12.28% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, MLPD is up 5.24% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.8% for MLPD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for MLPD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MLPD charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MLPD currently yields 13.51% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
MLPD and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2783 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MLPD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OMC | 103.91% | 0.03% | 103.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MLPD or VTI?
MLPD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MLPD or VTI?
Over the past year MLPD returned +12.28% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MLPD annualized +11.68% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MLPD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.8% for MLPD. Worst drawdown: MLPD -13.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both MLPD and VTI?
MLPD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MLPD and VTI?
MLPD and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2783 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MLPD or VTI?
MLPD yields 13.51% while VTI yields 1.07%, so MLPD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.