MLPD vs VOO
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MLPD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $29M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.51% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +3.44% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.09% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MLPD vs VOO Performance
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MLPD returned +10.09% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, MLPD is up 3.44% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.0% for MLPD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for MLPD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MLPD charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MLPD currently yields 13.51% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MLPD and VOO share 1 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MLPD | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OMC | 103.91% | 0.03% | 103.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MLPD or VOO?
MLPD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MLPD or VOO?
Over the past year MLPD returned +10.09% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MLPD annualized +10.89% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MLPD or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.0% for MLPD. Worst drawdown: MLPD -13.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MLPD and VOO?
MLPD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MLPD and VOO?
MLPD and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MLPD or VOO?
MLPD yields 13.51% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MLPD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.