MLPD vs VXUS
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MLPD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $31M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.71% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +6.10% | +15.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.60% | +26.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MLPD vs VXUS Performance
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MLPD returned +11.60% while VXUS returned +26.73%. Year to date, MLPD is up 6.10% versus a gain of 15.52% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.8% for MLPD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for MLPD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MLPD charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MLPD currently yields 13.71% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MLPD and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7870 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MLPD or VXUS?
MLPD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MLPD or VXUS?
Over the past year MLPD returned +11.60% vs +26.73% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MLPD annualized +11.84% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MLPD or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.8% for MLPD. Worst drawdown: MLPD -13.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MLPD and VXUS?
MLPD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MLPD and VXUS?
MLPD and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7870 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MLPD or VXUS?
MLPD yields 13.71% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so MLPD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.