MLPD vs VXUS
MLPD vs VXUS
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MLPD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $29M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 13.51% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.44% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.09% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 7, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MLPD vs VXUS Performance
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MLPD returned +10.09% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MLPD is up 3.44% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.0% for MLPD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for MLPD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MLPD charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MLPD currently yields 13.51% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MLPD and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MLPD or VXUS?
MLPD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MLPD or VXUS?
Over the past year MLPD returned +10.09% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MLPD annualized +10.89% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MLPD or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.0% for MLPD. Worst drawdown: MLPD -13.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MLPD and VXUS?
MLPD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MLPD and VXUS?
MLPD and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MLPD or VXUS?
MLPD yields 13.51% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MLPD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.