MMIT vs VOO
NYLI MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. MMIT offers more diversification with 525 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MMIT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.86% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,608 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.97% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.59% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.58% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.91% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MMIT vs VOO Performance
NYLI MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF (MMIT) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MMIT returned +4.59% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, MMIT is up 0.97% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, MMIT compounded at +3.58% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.91% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +1.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 5.0% for MMIT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for MMIT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MMIT charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMIT currently yields 3.86% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MMIT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1030 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MMIT or VOO?
MMIT has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MMIT or VOO?
Over the past year MMIT returned +4.59% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), MMIT annualized +1.43% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MMIT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 5.0% for MMIT. Worst drawdown: MMIT -12.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MMIT and VOO?
MMIT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MMIT and VOO?
MMIT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1030 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MMIT or VOO?
MMIT yields 3.86% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MMIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.